Beef-friendly Nebraska eyes regulations on the word 'meat'

Beef-friendly Nebraska eyes regulations on the word ‘meat’

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — More than 4 months after Missouri turned the first U.S. state to manage the time period “meat” on product labels, Nebraska’s highly effective farm teams are pushing for comparable safety from veggie burgers, tofu canines and different gadgets that look and style like actual meat.

Nebraska lawmakers will take into account a invoice this yr to stop firms that bundle and promote meals from promoting plant-based, insect-based and lab-grown products as meat. Similar measures are pending in Tennessee, Virginia and Wyoming.

The subject strikes a very robust twine in Nebraska, certainly one of the nation’s high states for livestock manufacturing, the place vehicles roll down the interstate with “Beef State” license plates and the governor annually proclaims May as “Beef Month.”

Farm teams have discovered an uncommon ally in state Sen. Carol Blood, a city-dwelling vegetarian from the Omaha suburb of Bellevue. Blood, who grew up on a farm, mentioned she launched the measure as a result of agriculture is Nebraska’s largest business and must be protected for the good of the complete state.

“I’m not bringing this bill to tell people what they can and can’t eat,” she mentioned. “All I’m asking for is truth in advertising. It’s clear that meat comes from livestock, and livestock is our livelihood in Nebraska.”

Nebraska led the nation in business crimson meat manufacturing in 2017 and had the most feed cows as of final yr, in keeping with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and livestock product gross sales generated an estimated $12.1 billion for the state’s financial system in 2016, in keeping with the USDA’s most up-to-date obtainable information.

The measure is for certain to face resistance from meals producers that promote plant-based alternate options, in addition to these working with the rising science of meat grown by culturing cells in a lab. Critics say the invoice infringes on the free-speech rights of firms that produce vegetarian alternate options to actual meat.

The Good Food Institute, the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, the Animal Legal Defense Fund and plant-based meals firm Tofurkey have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Missouri law . They argue the regulation unfairly stifles competitors.

The Nebraska invoice “would censor food labels and create consumer confusion where there is none,” mentioned Jessica Almy, director of coverage for the Washington-based Good Food Institute. “You can’t censor speech just to promote one industry’s financial success.”

Supporters of the Nebraska measure say they wish to guarantee individuals aren’t misled about what they’re consuming.

Blood mentioned she proposed the measure after seeing two ladies in a grocery retailer who couldn’t inform whether or not a product contained meat or a substitute. She mentioned her proposal wouldn’t require inspections of product labels, as Missouri’s regulation does.

“I don’t want to be the meat police,” she mentioned.

The Nebraska invoice would ban “any misleading or deceptive practices,” together with claims product is meat when it isn’t derived from livestock or poultry. Violating the regulation would deliver a misdemeanor cost punishable by as much as a yr in jail and a $1,000 advantageous.

“Consumers have a right to know what they’re buying,” mentioned John Hansen, president of the Nebraska Farmers Union. “That’s the case whether it’s a vegetarian product or not. There ought to be clear, honest and accurate labeling, and then let the marketplace make the choices.”

Hansen mentioned his group’s livestock producers are significantly involved about whether or not shoppers will be capable to differentiate between meat grown in the lab and farm-grown beef, pork and rooster.

Pete McClymont, government vp for the group Nebraska Cattlemen, mentioned his group’s concern rises partly from the development of merchandise labeled as almond and soy milk, which have develop into an more and more widespread different to cow’s milk. McClymont mentioned his group nonetheless must evaluate particular particulars of the Nebraska proposal, however will push for any regulation that protects the state’s livestock producers.

“When I go out and speak to our membership, this is right near the top of what people are passionate about,” he mentioned.

___

Follow Grant Schulte on Twitter at https://twitter.com/GrantSchulte



Source link