Disability rights groups voice issues with Starbucks’ plastic straw ban as company responds

Disability rights groups voice issues with Starbucks’ plastic straw ban as company responds

An official from Starbucks reached out to incapacity rights activists on Saturday, the day earlier than a deliberate protest in opposition to its latest ban on plastic straws, in what a number of incapacity rights groups stated was the beginning of a direct dialog concerning the ban.

After Starbucks introduced on July 9 it could section out plastic straws from its shops by 2020, incapacity rights activists have been involved the coverage would exclude some individuals with disabilities. Several New York City-based groups, together with the Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled and Disabled in Action, had deliberate to protest outdoors a Union Square Starbucks on Sunday after the annual Disability Pride Parade.

The activists had hoped the protest would assist unfold consciousness about their issues, however cancelled it after a cellphone name with Starbucks Global Director for Environment Rebecca Zimmer, who reached out to the Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled to debate the coverage.

“It was clearly a response to our plans to protest,” stated Joseph Rappaport, Executive Director on the Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled (BCID).

Starbucks launched an announcement on Friday specifying that straws can be out there for anybody who asks to make use of them. “Starbucks offers, and will continue to offer, straws to customers who need or request them in our stores,” the statement said.

Leaders from the BCID say they need Starbucks to verify single-use plastic straws can be found, no questions requested, to those that asks for them. On Saturday’s name, Zimmer stated Starbucks would supply straws to anybody who requested, however didn’t affirm they might be plastic, in line with Rappaport.

“To be clear, they haven’t met our demands, but we’re hoping they will after continuing the conversation,” Rappaport stated.

Zimmer was not out there for touch upon Sunday. “We are pleased with the outcome and look forward to ongoing conversations on this topic,” Sanja Gould, a Starbucks spokesperson, informed the NewsHour Weekend by way of electronic mail.

Starbucks’ announcement that they might section all plastic straws out from their shops has gained reward from many environmentalists. But individuals with disabilities who depend on plastic straws to eat, drink and reside their each day lives say banning straws would hurt many of their neighborhood and that they weren’t included within the dialog.

“If you think about it, a straw, it seems so small and insignificant. But this seemingly insignificant thing just shows how little those policy makers and business owners pay attention to us, or want to get our feedback,” stated Sharon Shapiro-Lacks, a BCID board member and government director of Yad HaChazakah, a Jewish group that advocates for individuals with disabilities.

“Eliminating plastic straws can cause many people with disabilities like myself not to be able to eat or drink in a restaurant, in a cafe … it’s more than just a convenience. It is a necessity for people like us,” she stated.

READ NEXT: Growing advocacy and awareness bringing accessible design to more people than ever

Starbucks isn’t the one company taking steps to get rid of plastic straws. Plastic straw bans have turn out to be more and more common on-line, with celebrities throwing their weight behind the difficulty and social media customers utilizing the hashtags #stopsucking and #plasticfreeocean to point out their help. Companies like McDonalds, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Ikea and Hyatt are engaged on phasing plastic straws out, too.

Seattle grew to become the primary main metropolis to ban straws earlier this month, and others like New York City, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., are contemplating laws to do the identical. Scotland, Taiwan, Australia and Costa Rica have handed plastic straw laws, too. Seattle’s legislation allows corporations to maintain plastic straws for individuals who require them.

A painful viral video from 2015, which exhibits a marine biologist eradicating a plastic straw wedged in a sea turtle’s nostril, impressed an outpouring of help for plastic straw bans, in line with environmentalists working to ban straws. That, plus rising public concern concerning the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and microplastics in oceans and seafood, had made banning straws look like a simple win to many environmentalists and politicians, in line with Rafael Espinal, who authored a invoice that will ban plastic straws in New York City.

Starbucks has stated they’re dedicated to discovering plastic straw alternate options that work for everybody. But incapacity rights advocates say these might not exist but. Plastic straws are versatile, sturdy, and might stand up to sizzling temperatures in case the person wants it to drink sizzling espresso or soup, for instance. As of now, advocates agree no straw alternate options appear to have the ability to do the identical.

“Other types of straws simply do not offer the combination of strength, flexibility, and safety that plastic straws do,” Disability Rights Washington stated in an open letter to the Seattle City Council.

Drinking straws protrude from a glass in a illustration image in Loughborough, Britain, on April 19, 2018. Photo by Darren Staples/Reuters

Paper straws get soggy and disintegrate, a possible choking hazard. Biodegradable straws can’t deal with sizzling temperatures. Stainless metal straws aren’t versatile, and might be doubtlessly harmful, slicing the mouth and gums if used improperly. If you’re somebody who has seizures, or poor motor perform, or have problem controlling muscle groups, metal and glass straws might not be a protected possibility. And Starbucks’ new “adult sippy cups” might not work for individuals who can’t elevate a cup to their mouth.

“People want to solve this problem in a nanosecond, and it’s not that simple,” stated Rappaport. “We have something that works. We have something that keeps people alive, and until we have an alternative, this is what we need to use.”

Shapiro-Lacks, who has cerebral palsy, not too long ago testified at a New York City Council listening to about not having the ability to entry a straw on an outing with her husband.

“My husband has had to hold the cup to my mouth in order for me to drink in a manner that draws public attention,” she stated. “This compromises my privacy and dignity.”

Starbucks is necessary as a result of it units an instance for different corporations who plan to ban straws, Shapiro-Lacks stated.

“If we do attain a superb resolution with Starbucks, that shall be main. And they’re in the event that they’re off monitor, it units a really poor instance,“ she stated.

Source link